前段时间搭了家里云，今天终于找到机会做个简单的跑分。

评 - 65W真香

为了省电，加上自己用不上170W TDP的全部性能，我直接把170W TDP的9950X设置了65W模式。
出乎我意料的是，65W的9950X性能相当不错，远超预期。

首先，无论是GB5还是GB6，单核跑分都没有任何差距。
GB6多核跑分，65W和170W差别不到10% - GB6针对前8核进行了额外的优化，因此65W相比170W没有明显劣势。
GB5多核跑分，65W (20000分左右)比170W(28000分)低了将近三分之一。GB5测试的是全部核心并发，因此170W的优势明显。但即便如此，65W的GB5多核跑分仍然相当于满血的9900X.

可见，如果用不满170W的全部性能，那么选择节能模式65W是非常不错的选择。

测

~# wget -qO- yabs.sh | bash -s -- -5 -6# ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ##              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              ##                     v2025-04-20                    ## https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## # Sun Aug 10 06:42:13 PM PDT 2025 Basic System Information:---------------------------------Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 5 minutesProcessor  : AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core ProcessorCPU cores  : 32 @ 2982.000 MHzAES-NI     : ✔ EnabledVM-x/AMD-V : ✔ EnabledRAM        : 125.4 GiBSwap       : 977.0 MiBDisk       : 374.5 GiBDistro     : Ubuntu 24.04.3 LTSKernel     : 6.14.0-27-genericVM Type    : NONEIPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ❌ Offline fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/nvme0n1p6):---------------------------------Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- Read       | 2.75 GB/s   (688.0k) | 2.23 GB/s    (34.9k)Write      | 2.75 GB/s   (689.8k) | 2.24 GB/s    (35.1k)Total      | 5.51 GB/s   (1377.8k) | 4.48 GB/s    (70.0k)           |                      |                     Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- Read       | 3.64 GB/s     (7.1k) | 4.15 GB/s     (4.0k)Write      | 3.83 GB/s     (7.4k) | 4.43 GB/s     (4.3k)Total      | 7.47 GB/s    (14.6k) | 8.59 GB/s     (8.3k) iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):---------------------------------Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 38.7 Mbits/sec  | 227 Mbits/sec   | 148 ms         Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 38.6 Mbits/sec  | 351 Mbits/sec   | 155 ms         Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | busy            | 332 Mbits/sec   | 247 ms         Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 37.0 Mbits/sec  | 312 Mbits/sec   | --             Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 41.3 Mbits/sec  | 427 Mbits/sec   | 17.4 ms        Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 40.0 Mbits/sec  | 389 Mbits/sec   | 78.8 ms        Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 34.9 Mbits/sec  | 215 Mbits/sec   | 179 ms          Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:---------------------------------Test            | Value                                         |                               Single Core     | 2629                          Multi Core      | 20581                         Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/23719814 Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:---------------------------------Test            | Value                                         |                               Single Core     | 3491                          Multi Core      | 19221                         Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/13262695 YABS completed in 10 min 4 sec